Sabtu, 28 Januari 2023

Bloom Taxonomy

Sumber Gambar: https://juliaec.wordpress.com

taksonomy

C1 Bloom's Taxonomy Bloom

Following the 1948 Convention of the American Psychological Association, B S Bloom took a lead in formulating a classification of "the goals of the educational process". Three "domains" of educational activities were identified. The first of these, named the Cognitive Domain, involves knowledge and the development of intellectual attitudes and skills. (The other domains are the Affective Domain and the Psychomotor Domain, and need not concern us here).

Eventually, Bloom and his co-workers established a hierarchy of educational objectives, which is generally referred to as Bloom's Taxonomy, and which attempts to divide cognitive objectives into subdivisions ranging from the simplest behaviour to the most complex.

It is important to realise that the divisions outlined above are not absolutes and that other systems or hierarchies have been devised. However, Bloom's taxonomy is easily understood and widely applied.
C1.1. Knowledge.

Knowledge is defined as the remembering of previously learned material. This may involve the recall of a wide range of material, from specific facts to complete theories, but all that is required is the bringing to mind of the appropriate information. Knowledge represents the lowest level of learning outcomes in the cognitive domain.

Examples of learning objectives at this level are: know common terms, know specific facts, know methods and procedures, know basic concepts, know principles.
C.1.2. Comprehension.

Comprehension is defined as the ability to grasp the meaning of material. This may be shown by translating material from one form to another (words to numbers), by interpreting material (explaining or summarizing), and by estimating future trends (predicting consequences or effects). These learning outcomes go one step beyond the simple remembering of material, and represent the lowest level of understanding.

Examples of learning objectives at this level are: understand facts and principles, interpret verbal material, interpret charts and graphs, translate verbal material to mathematical formulae, estimate the future consequences implied in data, justify methods and procedures.
C.1.3. Application.

Application refers to the ability to use learned material in new and concrete situations. This may include the application of such things as rules, methods, concepts, principles, laws, and theories. Learning outcomes in this area require a higher level of understanding than those under comprehension.

Examples of learning objectives at this level are: apply concepts and principles to new situations, apply laws and theories to practical situations, solve mathematical problems, construct graphs and charts, demonstrate the correct usage of a method or procedure.
C.1.4. Analysis.

Analysis refers to the ability to break down material into its component parts so that its organizational structure may be understood. This may include the identification of parts, analysis of the relationship between parts, and recognition of the organizational principles involved. Learning outcomes here represent a higher intellectual level than comprehension and application because they require an understanding of both the content and the structural form of the material.

Examples of learning objectives at this level are: recognize unstated assumptions, recognises logical fallacies in reasoning, distinguish between facts and inferences, evaluate the relevancy of data, analyse the organizational structure of a work (art, music, writing).
C.1.5. Synthesis.

Synthesis refers to the ability to put parts together to form a new whole. This may involve the production of a unique communication (theme or speech), a plan of operations (research proposal), or a set of abstract relations (scheme for classifying information). Learning outcomes in this area stress creative behaviours, with major emphasis on the formulation of new patterns or structure.

Examples of learning objectives at this level are: write a well organized theme, gives a well organized speech writes a creative short story (or poem or music), propose a plan for an experiment, integrate learning from different areas into a plan for solving a problem, formulates a new scheme for classifying objects (or events, or ideas).
C.1.6. Evaluation.

Evaluation is concerned with the ability to judge the value of material (statement, novel, poem, research report) for a given purpose. The judgments are to be based on definite criteria. These may be internal criteria (organization) or external criteria (relevance to the purpose) and the student may determine the criteria or be given them. Learning outcomes in this area are highest in the cognitive hierarchy because they contain elements of all the other categories, plus conscious value judgments based on clearly defined criteria.

Examples of learning objectives at this level are: judge the logical consistency of written material, judge the adequacy with which conclusions are supported by data, judge the value of a work (art, music, writing) by the use of internal criteria, judge the value of a work (art, music, writing) by use of external standards of excellence.

There is a great deal of information on Bloom's taxonomy on the Web. Some starting points are:

* http://www.coun.uvic.ca/learn/program/hndouts/bloom.html
* http://cleo.murdoch.edu.au/gen/aset/confs/edtech98/pubs/articles/abcd/dalgarno.html
* http://152.30.11.86/deer/Houghton/learner/think/bloomsTaxonomy.html
* http://amath.colorado.edu/courses/7400/1996Spr/bloom.html
* http://www.stedwards.edu/cte/blooms.htm
* http://quarles.unbc.edu/lsc/bloom.html
* http://www.dlrn.org/library/dl/guide4.html

Return to Contents of this Chapter
C2 Application of Bloom's Taxonomy to the design of MCQs
C2.1 Level 1: Knowledge

At this level, one simply requires the recall of acquired knowledge. WARNING! A test at this level can easily become a "Trivial Pursuit" exercise!

Example C2.1.1

Which one of the following persons is the author of "Das Kapital"?

1. Mannheim
2. Marx
3. Weber
4. Engels
5. Michels

Note that the responses are internally consistent - they are all the names of Germans whose written work have been major contributions on social issues.

Example C2.1.2

In the area of physical science, which one of the following definitions
describes the term "polarization"?

1. The separation of electric charges by friction.
2. The ionization of atoms by high temperatures.
3. The interference of sound waves in a closed chamber.
4. The excitation of electrons by high frequency light.
5. The vibration of transverse waves in a single plane.

Simple recall of the correct definition of polarization (#5) is required. Internal consistency and plausibility are maintained in that all responses are actual physical phenomena.

Example C2.1.3

According to the microgenesis of perception concept, the threshold
of awareness consists of a hierarchy of thresholds. Which one of the
sequences shown below is correct?

1. Recognition thresholds > physiological thresholds > detection
thresholds.
2. Physiological thresholds > detection thresholds > recognition
thresholds.
3. Physiological thresholds > recognition thresholds > detection
thresholds.
4. Recognition thresholds > detection thresholds > physiological
thresholds.


In this example, nothing more is required than the recall of the order of certain pieces of related information. The correct answer is #2.

C2.2 Level 2. Comprehension

At this level, knowledge of facts, theories, procedures etc. is assumed, and one tests for understanding of this knowledge.

Example C2.2.1

Which one of the following describes what takes place in the so-called
PREPARATION stage of the creative process, as applied to the solution
of a particular problem?

1. The problem is identified and defined.
2. All available information about the
problem is collected.
3. An attempt is made to see if the proposed
solution to the problem is acceptable.
4. The person goes through some experience
leading to a general idea of how the problem
can be solved.
5. The person sets the problem aside, and gets
involved with some other unrelated activity.


In this question, the knowledge of the five stages of the creative process must be recalled (KNOWLEDGE), and one is tested for an understanding (COMPREHENSION) of the meaning of each term, in this case, "preparation".

Note that this question violates the rule that the answer and distractors should all be of about the same length. It is difficult to get around this one here, so the text is edited so that each line is about the same length.
C2.3 Level 3: Application

In order to classify a question into this group, ask yourself if prior knowledge of the background to the question is assumed to be both known and understood, and whether one is merely expected to apply this knowledge and understanding. Calculations based on known formulae are good examples of this, as shown in the example below:

Example C2.3.1

Which one of the following values approximates best to the
volume of a sphere with radius 5m?

a. 2000m³
b 1000m³
c. 500m³
d 250m³
e. 125m³


In order to answer this question, the formula 4[pi]r³> /3 must be known (recall of knowledge) and the meaning of the various symbols in the formula understood (comprehension) in order to answer this question. The correct answer is #3.

Example C2.3.2

Which one of the following memory systems does a piano-tuner
mainly use in his occupation?

1. Echoic memory.
2. Short-term memory.
3. Long-term memory.
4. Mono-auditory memory.
5. None of the above.


This is clearly a case of testing for the application of previously acquired knowledge (the various memory systems), which is also understood, as the meaning of each term must be clear before the student can decide whether it is applicable to the given situation. The correct answer is #1. Note that students may not necessarily know what a piano- tuner is or does. Watch out for cultural bias!

The next example is more difficult to classify:

Example C2.3.3

You are the sole owner and manager of a small enterprise
employing 15 workers. One of these, Alfred, (who has been
working for you for the past year and has somewhat of a
history of absenteeism), arrives late for work one Wednesday
morning, noticeably intoxicated. Which one of the following
actions is the most appropriate in the circumstances?

1. You terminate Alfred's employment on the spot, paying him
the wages still due to him.
2. You parade Alfred in front of the other workers, to teach them
all a lesson.
3. You give Alfred three weeks' wages in lieu of notice, and
sack him.
4. You wait until Alfred is sober, discuss his problem, and give
him a final written warning, should it be required.
5. You call Alfred's wife to take him home and warn her that this
must not happen again.


Note that this this question is classified as APPLICATION as in order to answer it, the relevant labour legislation should be known and understood. One could made a case for it to have a higher classification such as EVALUATION, on the grounds that one is asked to evaluate which one of the proposed actions is the best in the circumstances, or ANALYSIS, on the grounds that in order to select the most appropriate answer, one should analyse the possible outcomesof each decision. For both these levels, one would expect a greater amount of information as to Alfred's situation, the relationship between Alfred and his co-workers, union involvement in the enterprise etc., and have a more sophisticated set of distractors. Here, option #4 is clearly the best both on legal and human terms. Note that the figure of speech "on the spot" may not be understood by second- language students. Use suitable language!
C2.4 Level 4: Analysis

Example C2.4.1

"The story is told of the famous German Organic Chemist
Auguste Kékulé who was struggling with the problem of how
the six carbon atoms of benzene were linked together. He was
getting nowhere with the problem, and one day fell asleep in
front of the fireplace while he was pondering on it. He
dreamt of molecules twisting and turning around like snakes.
Suddenly, one of the snakes swallowed its own tail and
rolled around like a hoop. Kékulé woke up with a start, and
realized that his problem could be solved if the six carbon
atoms of benzene were attached to each other to form a ring.
Further work showed that this was entirely correct."

The above passage illustrates a particular phase of the
creative process. Which one is it?

1. preparation
2. incubation
3. orientation
4. illumination
5. verification


In the above example, the student is expected to know and understand the five stages of the creative process, and to apply this knowledge to an important factual example of creative thinking (the elucidation of the chemical structure of the benzene molecule). The ability to analyse the data (i.e. the given text) in terms of each of the five stages is what is being tested. The correct answer, by the way, is #4.

Example C2.4.2 (Assume the question below is asked in a philosophy test.)

Read carefully through the paragraph below, and decide which
of the options 1-5 is correct.

"The basic premise of pragmatism is that questions posed by
speculative metaphysical propositions can often be answered
by determining what the practical consequences of the
acceptance of a particular metaphysical proposition are in
this life. Practical consequences are taken as the criterion
for assessing the relevance of all statements or ideas about
truth, norm and hope."

1. The word "acceptance" should be replaced by "rejection".
2. The word "often" should be replaced by "only".
3. The word "speculative" should be replaced by "hypothetical".
4. The word "criterion" should be replaced by "measure".


This question requires prior knowledge of and understanding about the concept of pragmatism. The paragraph, seen in this light, contains one word which vitiates its validity, and the student is tested on his/her ability to analyze it to see whether it fits with the accepted definition of pragmatism. With this in mind, #2 is correct. Option #1 would degrade the paragraph further, while #3 and #4 would simply result in changing to acceptable synonyms. Note that this question does not address Level 6 (Evaluation), as one is not asked to pass a value judgement on the text. This must be considered as a very difficult question, and will obviously require a high level of reading skills. Bear in mind that there will be a significant time factor involved.

Example C2.4.3

Look at the following table and indicate which countries'
statistics are being reported in rows A, B and C.

GNP per capita 1991 ($ USA) Growth rate of GNP per capita p.a. 1980-91 Population growth rate 1980-91 Structures of total employment 1980-85 (percentages)
Agriculture Industry Services
A 500 2,5% 1,5% 51 20 29
B 1570 5,8% 1,6% 74 8 8
S.A. 2560 0,7% 2,5% 17 36 36
C 25110 1,7% 0,3% 6 32 32

Choose your answer from the following list of possible
answers:

1. A is South Korea; B is Kenya; C is Canada.
2. A is Sri Lanka; B is Germany; C is Thailand.
3. A is Sri Lanka; B is Thailand; C is Sweden.
4. A is Namibia; B is Portugal; C is Botswana.


In order to answer this question, students must be able to recall the relative economic rankings of various countries (KNOWLEDGE) and understand the basis for such a ranking (COMPREHENSION). They must be able to apply these concepts when information is supplied to them (APPLICATION), and they must be able to ANALYZE the given information in order to answer the question. Students did not like this question when they were faced with it in a class test, as their immediate reaction was that "it was impossible to remember the statistics for all the countries that were discussed in class and given to them in handouts". They were surprised when told that such detailed knowledge was in fact not expected of them, but that they were to examine the table and perform a ranking on the basis of concepts that they should have mastered. The correct answer is 3.
C2.5 Level 6: Evaluation

At this level, one is asked to pass judgement on, for example, the logical consistency of written material, the validity of experimental procedures or interpretation of data.

Example C2.5.1

A student was asked the following question: "Briefly list
and explain the various stages of the creative process".

As an answer, this student wrote the following:

"The creative process is believed to take place in five
stages, in the following order: ORIENTATION, when the
problem must be identified and defined, PREPARATION, when
all the possible information about the problem is
collected, INCUBATION, when there is a period where no
solution seems in sight and the person is often busy with
other tasks, ILLUMINATION, when the person experiences
a general idea of how to arrive at a solution to the
problem, and finally VERIFICATION, when the person
determines whether the solution is the right one for the
problem."

How would you judge this student' s answer?

1. EXCELLENT (all stages correct in the right order
with clear and correct explanations)
2. GOOD (all stages correct in the right order, but the
explanations are not as clear as they should be).
3. MEDIOCRE (one or two stages are missing OR the
stages are in the wrong order, OR the explanations
are not clear OR the explanations are irrelevant)
4. UNACCEPTABLE (more than two stages are missing
AND the order is incorrect AND the explanations
are not clear AND/OR they are irrelevant)

In the above question, one is expected to make value judgment on the content of the given text (KNOWLEDGE of the subject is required), the meaning of the terminology used (COMPREHENSION of the subject matter), and its structure (ANALYSIS of the answer for the right order of events. The correct answer here is #1, but suitable modification of the putative student answer could provide a small bank of questions with other correct answers

Example C2.5.2

Another example is the "Assertion/Reason" question, in which two statements linked by "BECAUSE" have to be evaluated in the light of certain criteria:

Judge the sentence in italics according to the criteria
given below:

"The United States took part in the Gulf War against Iraq
BECAUSE of the lack of civil liberties imposed on the Kurds
by Saddam Hussein's regime."


a. The assertion and the reason are both correct, and the
reason is valid.
b. The assertion and the reason are both correct, but the
reason is invalid.
c The assertion is correct but the reason is incorrect.
d. The assertion is incorrect but the reason is correct.
e. Both the assertion and the reason are incorrect.
The correct answer is "b", since while it is true that the United States took part in the Gulf War, it is also true that the Kurds in Iraq did not (and still do not) enjoy an abundance of civil liberties, but the threat to the US's oil supply as a result of Iraq's invasion of Kuwait was a much more pertinent reason for the United States joining in the fray. A knowledge and understanding of Middle East politics is assumed. What is tested here is the ability to evaluate the between cause and effect in the sentence in terms of predefined criteria.
Return to Contents of this Chapter
Links to other Chapters:
|Title Page|Contents|Chapter 1|Chapter 2|Chapter 3|Chapter 4|Appendix A|Appendix B|Appendix D| Appendix E|

HTML 3.2 Checked!
srifitarahmawati0 komentar

Minggu, 04 April 2010

poem

Definition of literry
Literature is literally “acquaintance with letters” (Latin littera meaning “an individual written character/letter”). The term has come to identify a collection of texts. As a proper noun it refers to a whole body of literary work
 We are concerned more with imaginative or creative writing. The kind of writing that is not real.
 A text is a creation of the poet/author/dramatist available to an audience and meant to create an impact – intellectual and emotional
 Words are the literary artist’s tools. Literature is verbal art.

Why we atudy literry
 We study literature because it enriches us; for wisdom, for entertainment, for an understanding of diverse human experiences.
 We study literature because it is profound, beautiful and moving.
 We study literature because it is an excellent way to sharpen your close reading skills, enable critical thinking, and refine our general sense of art appreciation
 There are many critical ways to approach a text including the formalist, biographical, historical, textual, psychological, mythological, sociological, deconstructionist, feminist, or reader-response, semiotic etc.
• Formalist critics focus on the formal elements of a text. They examine the relationship between form and meaning, emphasizing how a work is arranged. This kind of close reading pays special attention to diction, figures of speech, plot, characterization, narrative technique, rhyme schemes, metre etc. Formalists look at how these elements work together to give shape to a work while contributing to its meaning. Information that goes beyond the text - biography, history, politics, economics, and so on - are regarded as extrinsic

Theory of literary

 mitative theory
Aristotle (384-322BC Poetics), mimesis, recreation, representation; art refines nature, learn about nature
 Expressive Theory
Artist expresses his/her feelings
 Affective theoIry
Work of art arouses emotion in / affects the reader

What is good literature and what is bad literature?
Lasting impression Fleeting
Stretches the imagination, complex Formulaic, simple
Aesthetically pleasing, artistic Ordinary, no real aesthetic value
Message traverses culture and Immediate value, no
time permanence
Accepted into the ‘canon’ Not on the list
Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare-1

To works, however, of which the excellence is not absolute and definite, but gradual and comparative; to works not raised upon principles demonstrative and scientifick, but appealing wholly to observation and experience, no other test can be applied than length of duration and continuance of esteem. What mankind have long possessed they have often examined and compared, and if they persist to value the possession, it is because frequent comparisons have confirmed opinion in its favour. As among the works of nature no man can properly call a river deep or a mountain
Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare-2
high, without the knowledge of many mountains and many rivers; so in the productions of genius, nothing can be stiled excellent till it has been compared with other works of the same kind. Demonstration immediately displays its power, and has nothing to hope or fear from the flux of years; but works tentative and experimental must be estimated by their proportion to the general and collective ability of man, as it is discovered in a long succession of endeavours. Of the first building that was raised, it might be with certainty determined that it was round or square, but whether it was
Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare-3
spacious or lofty must have been referred to time. The Pythagorean scale of numbers was at once discovered to be perfect; but the poems of Homer we yet know not to transcend the common limits of human intelligence, but by remarking, that nation after nation, and century after century, has been able to do little more than transpose his incidents, new name his characters, and paraphrase his sentiments.

Example: from The Elder Edda, "Words of the High One"
The coward believes he will live forever
If he holds back in the battle.
But in old age he shall have no peace
Though spears have spared his limbs.
Cattle die, kindred die,
Every man is mortal:
But I know one thing that never dies,
The glory of the great deed.
(The Poetic Edda is a collection of Old Norse poems from the Icelandic mediaeval manuscript Codex Regius. 13th century.)
Critically thinking about and reading literature
 ANALYZE: What does the passage mean, literally?
 INTERPRET: What does it mean figuratively? How do you read it and what suggests that this is a valid interpretation?
 QUESTION: What problems are suggested by the reading? What philosophical question(s) does the reading inspire?
 SYNTHESIZE: How does this reading compare or contrast in content/form with what you've read before?
 EVALUATE: The writing. What criteria do you use to establish this judgment? What defines a first rate poem, play, story etc?
 Elder Edda -2ANALYZE, LITERAL MEANING (paraphrase):
This excerpt tells us that only cowards would think to save their own lives rather than fight the battle to the end. But surviving thus, the coward will not have any piece of mind; he'll be tormented right into old age.
 It's better to die, since every living thing is mortal anyway. But the great deed is immortal. So, it's better to die in battle and possibly achieve great deeds rather than preserve mortal life. INTERPRET, SYMBOLIC MEANING
The battle may be symbolic of life itself. Just living life may be a battle but, this poet tells us, only cowards choose to turn their back on it. If we let life pass us by and not seize the moment then we'll have nothing in old age but regrets. Better to perform the ‘great deeds’ without fear of loss.
Life and death also equated with success and failure, loving and losing, sadness and happiness etc.
 QUESTION
What are ‘great deeds’? Personally, culturally, historically?


 SYNTHESIZE (excerpt from Homer’s The Iliad, Book IX)
Of possessions cattle and fat sheep are things to be had for the lifting,
and tripods can be won, and the tawny high heads of horses,
but a man's life cannot come back again, it cannot be lifted
nor captured again by force, once it has crossed the teeth's barrier.
For my mother Thetis the goddess of the silver feet tells me
I carry two sorts of destiny toward the day of my death. Either,
if I stay here and fight beside the city of the Trojans,
my return home is gone, but my glory shall be everlasting;
but if I return home to the beloved land of my fathers,
the excellence of my glory is gone, but there will be a long life
left for me, and my end in death will not come to me quickly.
And this would be my counsel to others also, to sail back
home again… (Achilles’ response to Odysseus)
 EVALUATE


Other questions:
Assuming this writer considers great deeds to be extreme valor in battle? Who is great then, the Iraqis, the Americans, both, neither?
Has there been anyone to perform a great deed in 1998?
SYNTHESIZE
Here's a neat little contrast to the sentiment described above. This passage is by Homer from the Illiad (Book IX), the famous ancient Greek epic of the Trojan War:
Of possessions cattle and fat sheep are things to be had for the lifting,
and tripods can be won, and the tawny high heads of horses,
but a man's life cannot come back again, it cannot be lifted
nor captured again by force, once it has crossed the teeth's barrier.
For my mother Thetis the goddess of the silver feet tells me
I carry two sorts of destiny toward the day of my death. Either,
if I stay here and fight beside the city of the Trojans,
my return home is gone, but my glory shall be everlasting;
but if I return home to the beloved land of my fathers,
the excellence of my glory is gone, but there will be a long life
left for me, and my end in death will not come to me quickly.
And this would be my counsel to others also, to sail back
home again…
The Iliad, Book IX (Lattimore, trans.)
This passage contradicts the first. How can I reconcile them? Does my knowledge of their contradiction help deepen my understanding of each? If I read the first passage with an awareness of the second, I probably have to form a mental argument in order to go along with the writer's proposition. I either agree or disagree and attempt to formulate why. All people are mortal; when they die they are utterly forgotten over time. The only way to live on beyond one's lifespan is to accomplish something valuable, something that will inspire others who come after. Great deeds are inspiring; they are the only path to immortality. Therefore, accomplishing great deeds is valuable at all costs, even the supreme cost, one's life. Or, I may say-this life is all we have; it's precious. To lose one's life for the sake of everlasting glory is a waste. We cannot be there to partake of the sweetness of that glory once we're dead. It's better to enjoy the simple things in life while we have life; we should not throw our lives away for vainglorious purposes.
Or, I may not choose to engage the readings on that kind of personal level. Maybe I merely create separate mental files to accommodate their differences. Perhaps I mentally file one poem as "pro-war" and the other as "anti-war" poetry. These are categories that may be useful later as I read other poems, or other literature.
EVALUATE
Until you read a LOT of literature, you probably won't have a clear sense about what makes "great" literature and what makes average literature, or worse, poor literature. You may feel that since you find it hard to understand any of it, it's all bad. But that would be a mistake. Like anything, learning to read literature takes time and practice. And developing an appreciation for great literature comes with exposure to the good and the bad. You may be tempted to say that you don't like Shakespeare, for instance, because his language isn't exactly the same as yours and you have to do a bit of work to piece out the meaning…but if you dismiss him, you are dismissing what most literary critics agree is one of the greatest-if not THE GREATEST-writers our language has ever known. To some extent you need to be willing to work as you read, and extend the benefit of the doubt until you are really sure you are evaluating a piece of writing on objective grounds, and not just on the basis of whether you personally struggled to comprehend it. In this course, you're being "introduced" to literature…that means you're being introduced to a new set of critical tools for thinking about literature and becoming a more thoughtful, more effective reader of literature. And hopefully, as you get more practice and become a more sophisticated reader, you'll be able to judge whether a work of literature is first or fifth rate. You'll be able to sense whether it's on the level of Shakespeare-truly original, multidimensional, moving, evocative, thought-provoking-or whether it's on the level of formula fiction: a dimestore novel or a Harlequin romance.
The Elder Edda is not a single continuous narrative, but a collection of poems, most of which are preserved in the Konungsbók, or Codex Regius (King's Book), copied in Iceland about A.D. 1270. The poems are the work of many poets. Their language suggests that they were composed between 800 and 1100 A.D. and first written down between 1150 and 1250 A.D. The poems are a rich source of information for culture and belief among the Vikings. They are not, however, purely Scandinavian. Christian Irish influence is likely, while the Sigurd story draws on actual events among the tribes that invaded the Roman Empire between 350-600 A.D.
The Elder Edda first came to scholarly attention in the seventeenth century as antiquarian interest in the non-classical past was growing in Europe. It was published in its entirety just as intense romantic and nationalistic interest in the perceived tribal ancestors of the European nation states emerged towards the end of the eighteenth century. This interest, combined with the new science of philology, ensured popular and scholarly interest in texts like the Elder Edda. Some of the lays were available in bowdlerized versions even for children by the later nineteenth century. In the hands of Richard Wagner, the Elder Edda became the foundation of one of the century's masterpieces. While northern legends and the scholarship based on it were misused by the Nazis to develop and further their ideas of race, they are seriously misrepresented by such ideas. In the 1960s, the poet W. H. Auden in collaboration with an Old Norse scholar, Paul B. Taylor, produced a translation of sixteen of the poems.
Elder Edda Summary
The Sibyl's Prophecy
At Odin's request, a prophetess predicts the future from creation to fall and renewal. She begins with a time when nothing existed; heavens and earth come into existence, but in chaos. The gods, who create the arts and crafts, social life, and finally, mankind, impose order. She prophesies the war between the Aesir and the Vanir and their conciliation, the death of Balder through Loki's trickery, Loki's punishment, the dwarves's golden home, the realm of the dead, and the punishment of the wicked. She foresees the final battle between gods and giants that will end in their mutual destruction. Sun and stars fail, the earth sinks beneath the sea, but in the final stanzas, she describes a second green earth rising from the waters. Balder and Hod, his blind brother who accidentally killed him, will come again to rule. Then a mighty one, sometimes identified as Christ, will come down to bring the deserving to a hall more beautiful than the sun.
The Sayings of the High One
This is a composite poem in which only stanzas 111-64 are in the voice of Odin the 'High One.' It begins with practical advice on behavior and attitude: "It takes sharp wits to travel in the world / they're not so hard on you at home—Better to be alive than to be lifeless / the living can hope for a cow." Even among such homely advice, however, is fame, so important to the epic attitude: "Cattle die, kinsmen die, / One day you die yourself; but the words of praise will not die." The poem ends with Odin's advice addressed to a young man called Loddfafnir.
The Lay of Vafthrudnir
Odin has a contest with the giant Vafthrudnir to determine who has the greater knowledge of the gods, creation, and the future. Odin wins because he alone knows what he whispered in Balder's ear as he lay on his funeral pyre. The lay serves as a glossary of the metaphors and images used in early Norse poetry.
The Lay of Grimnir
Hunding had two sons: Agnar and Geirrod. They were fishing from a rowboat and were swept out to sea. When they made land, a farmer took them in until spring came. When they arrived back home, Geirrod jumped out of the boat and pushed it and his brother back out to sea. Geirrod became king. Later, Odin and Frigg, his wife, were looking down at earth. Odin teased Frigg that Geirrod, whom he favored, was king while Agnar, whom Frigg favored, lived in the wilds. Frigg answered that Geirrod was stingy. Odin bet her he would find him generous to strangers. Frigg sends a message to Geirrod to beware of a wizard coming to his court, describing Odin in disguise. Odin arrives and when he refuses to give more than an assumed name, Grimnir, he is seated between two fires to make him speak. Geirrod's son Agnar thinks it wrong to mistreat a guest and brings him a drink. For this act, Odin blesses the boy and tells him his real name. When the king hears, he jumps up to take him away from the fires, but stumbles and falls on his own sword.
Skirnir's Journey
This lay tells of the god Frey who saw and loved a giant's beautiful daughter. He sent his servant Skirnir to persuade her to accept him as her lover. Skirnir cajoles and threatens her until she finally accepts Frey.
The Lay of Harbard
The first of the comical lays. Odin disguised himself as a ferryman and engaged Thor in a duel of words. Thor loses badly.
The Lay of Hymir
The gods are feeling like a party and ask the giant Aegir to brew beer for it. Thor unfortunately annoys Aegir. Aegir tells Thor he must borrow the giant Hymir's brewing vat. Thor and Tyr, Hymir's son, set out for Hymir's home where Hymir's young mistress welcomes them. She warns them Hymir does not like guests and makes them hide when he comes. She tells Hymir that his son has come with a friend. Three bulls are cooked for dinner. Thor eats two of them. Hymir tells his guests that they will go out hunting for supper. Thor suggests that he will take a boa
ANALYZE
LITERAL MEANING: This brief excerpt tells us that only cowards would think to save their own skins rather than fight the battle to the end. Even if he survives, the coward will not have piece of mind; he'll be tormented right into old age. It's better to die, since every man is mortal anyhow. The great deed is immortal. It's better to die in battle, and possibly achieve great deeds, than to save your skin. Nothing ventured, nothing gained.
INTERPRET
SYMBOLIC MEANING: The battle may be symbolic of life itself. Sometimes just living your life is a battle. It's a battle to get up, go to work, get fired (laid off), fall in love, get burned…but, this poet tells us, only cowards choose to turn their back on the battle. If we let up now, if we let life pass us by, if we refuse to seize the moment (carpe diem!) then we'll reach old age with nothing but a pile of regrets. Better to risk it, take chances, LIVE life to its hilt, gather the "great deeds" while we can. Not only will we reach old age in peace, but we'll glory in our accomplishments, and others will too. We can be an inspiration.
QUESTION
The writer mentions "great deeds." So I assume we're not talking about just any old ordinary deed. If I wake up tomorrow morning and manage to brush my teeth, wash my face, eat breakfast, and make it out of the house in time to get to class, I may be performing responsible deeds, but not GREAT deeds. Several questions occur to me. Assuming this writer has a point-our great deeds are immortal-then my first question is, what ranks as a "great deed"? Would the writer define a great deed the same way I would? How would I define a great deed? What's an example of a great deed in my own mind? (I'm reflecting on my own lifetime and whatever I can conjure up from my knowledge of history, at this point.) Then I might turn philosopher and ask: how do we define the GREAT DEED for our times, in our cultur